ISLAMABAD: The Registrar’s Office of the Supreme Court on Monday came back with objections to the petition to dissolve the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI).
Aoon Chaudhry, Additional Secretary General of the newly formed Isthikam Pakistan Party (IPP) filed a petition under Article 184(3) of the Constitution seeking dissolution of the PTI.
He has created the Federation of Pakistan through secretaries from the Ministries of Law and Justice, Interior and Defense as well as Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), Imran Khan Niazi, Tehreek-e-Insaf President Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi, Prime Minister. Defense Minister Mian Shahbaz Sharif and Defense Minister Khawaja Asif are defendants.
The petitioner urged the Supreme Court to declare the actions of PTI, its chairman and office bearers, their hate speech attacking the judiciary, defense, burning and looting of public property etc. completely unconstitutional, fundamental rights. Violation of and be declared under various provisions. Constitution of Pakistan including but not limited to Articles 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 14, 15, 22, 24, 29, 28, 39 and 40 of the Constitution of Pakistan and thus liable to dissolve his party. There was
However, the Registrar’s Office returned the petition raising the objection that the requirements of Article 184(3) of the Constitution were not fulfilled while filing the petition.
The office added that it was not clear in the petition how the party was banned under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution, adding that the instant petition did not specify how PTI was banned. public interest.
The office also said that the IPP leader, who is also the advisor to the prime minister on sports and tourism, did not approach the relevant forum before filing the application.
The Registrar’s Office also said that under Article 248 of the Constitution, the Prime Minister and the Defense Minister cannot be made parties to the case.
